Rudy M.

That would be super helpful, thanks. I plan to ask my auditors too, once I'm through our current SOC2 audit round.

more reading context -> funnel.io/devblog/the-integration-of-ai-code-reviews-at-funnel

Thanks. Would love to hear where you land, once you get further please. It's a topic I presume most of us will need to address in some form over the next few weeks/months. Thanks

Great "interview" and discussion. Biggest take away for me was the thought-works, "calm-pliance" and path to analysing next steps && solid tips to handling conflict in a very professional manor. Very insightful. Thanks for sharing and looking forward to the next one.

some useful reading on the topic -> ideas.fin.ai/p/ai-is-approving-our-pull-requests RK K. - curious to hear if you progressed any further in your discovery?

Would be neat if one day (when I'm big), the solution was a query to the source instead of needing all contracts to be stored in Vanta, as that's a bigger ask IMHO.

ah, that link answers what I was trying to understand. Got it, thanks.

Curious - does this then integrate with existing CRM's (eg. Salesforce) data to be able to query agreements at the source? (eg. if signed agreements are stored in CRM) Disclaimer : I'm not on the available tier, so I'm merely curious for future self than anything else atm.

will take a look when I get time. But as I read it ATM, my issue was less about role access to the risk, and more about who to assign the RISK ownership to. ie I wanted to assign the risk to a TEAM. but maybe the middle ground of have 1 named person as the risk owner, and then have the team as role access would work. I'll play in a few weeks. Can't play this week.

Can't remember the feature request trigger from here. But would be nice to add that as feature request again please. 🙏 (Jacob G.)