Access Review isn't supposed to be an endurance sport ![]()
So Vanta fixed that.
Vanta now uses AI to recommend Approve, Deny, or Needs Review for every account in your access reviews, so you can stop manually assessing thousands of accounts (big yikes!) and focus on the ones that actually matter. Faster reviews, fewer mistakes, less fatigue. What's not to love?
Availability: Plus, Professional, Access Management
And just for fun: What's an actual endurance sport you like? For me, it's running and swimming.
Nice touch. Excited to see what accounts AI recommends to deny. & Cycling of course! Does Vanta have any 馃毑 merch(bidons)? 馃憖
Jonathan M. me too! we have lots of cyclists on my team here at Vanta too. And while we dont have bidons, I think I can do something just as good for you. Sending you a DM shortly ![]()
What signals is this pulling? I saw access requests in Vanta and the last login details. Anything else? It would be great to see something like "85% of people in the [insert IdP group) also have this permission."
Hey Aaron: thanks for the follow up here. The signals: employment status, last login, access control policy, previous decisions, and prior access requests.
And totally hear you on wanting more transparency into what's driving each recommendation. The cohort/peer benchmarking idea (e.g. "X% of people in this group have this permission") would definitely make the recommendations feel more defensible at scale. Can you please submit that feedback using this form? It will logged accordingly on our end
![]()
